Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoud, Ensieh Kheiri Pileh
dc.contributor.authorGausdal, Anne Haugen
dc.contributor.authorAsgary, Ali
dc.contributor.authorCarlström, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T12:53:06Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T12:53:06Z
dc.date.created2020-11-04T14:03:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRoud, E., Gausdal, A. H., Asgary, A. & Carlström, E. (2020). Outcome of collaborative emergency exercises: Differences between full‐scale and tabletop exercises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. doi:en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-5973
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2727445
dc.descriptionAuthor's accepted version (postprint).en_US
dc.descriptionThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Wiley in Journal of Contigencies and Crisis Management on 03/11/2020.
dc.descriptionAvailable online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.12339
dc.description.abstractThe degree to which exercises improve the collaboration among different organizations during an emergency is under debate. This study aims to contribute to the scarce research on this topic by giving insight into the perceived effects of exercises on collaboration, learning, usefulness and interorganizational trust. In particular, this quantitative study looked into the differences between the effects of tabletop and full‐scale exercises. A questionnaire assessing collaboration, learning, usefulness and trust—the CLUT instrument—was developed. Data were collected from 173 full‐time emergency management personnel in Norway and Canada. Usefulness, learning and collaboration outcomes were perceived to be high for both types of exercises, but full‐scale exercises were perceived to have greater learning and usefulness outcomes than tabletop exercises. Stronger relationships were identified between the perceived effects on learning and usefulness, collaboration and trust in tabletop compared to full‐scale exercise, whereas the relationship between the perceived effects upon collaboration and trust was stronger in full‐scale exercises. Multiple regression analysis showed that the variables used to measure exercise usefulness can better predict tabletop exercise outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.titleOutcome of collaborative emergency exercises : Differences between full‐scale and tabletop exercisesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.source.pagenumber15en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Managementen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-5973.12339
dc.identifier.cristin1844910


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record