Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHoset, Katrine S.
dc.contributor.authorHusby, Magne
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-11T12:58:30Z
dc.date.available2020-06-11T12:58:30Z
dc.date.created2019-01-28T14:17:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationHoset, K. S., Husby, M. (2019). Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes? PLOS ONE, 14(1): e0210151. doi:en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2657731
dc.description.abstractNest predation studies often use artificial nests to secure sample sizes and nest distribution patterns that allow empirically testing differences in predation rates between ecological units of interest. These studies rely on the assumption that natural and artificial nests experience similar or consistent relative predation rates across ecological gradients. As this assumption may depend on several factors (for example differences in predator community, nest construction, parental care patterns), it is important to test whether artificial nests provide adequate and comparable estimates of predation rates to natural nests. In this study, we compare predation rates of above-ground natural open-cup nests, artificial nests and natural nests with artificial eggs along a forest gradient from edge to interior (interior, transition zone and edge) and within two nest visibility classes (visible and concealed). Our aim was to determine whether nest structure affects comparability between nest types along these ecological gradients in boreal forests. Our results indicated important contributions of nest type, nest visibility and location along the forest edge-interior gradient, but no variable had strong significant effects on predation rates, except exposure time that showed lower predation rates at longer exposure times. Predation rates in visible and concealed nests remained similar for all nest types, but not along the forest edge-interior gradient. Here, artificial nests showed much lower predation rates than natural nests, whereas natural nests with artificial eggs tended to have higher predation rates than natural nests. We conclude that artificial nests in boreal forests represent an adequate measure of relative nest predation risk in open-cup natural nests along some ecological gradients, but results on predation rates along forest edge-interior gradients obtained from artificial nests should be interpreted with care.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAre predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480::Økologi: 488en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480::Etologi: 485en_US
dc.source.pagenumber15en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0210151
dc.identifier.cristin1666486


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal