Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Stian
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Markus Estifanos
dc.contributor.authorvan den Tillaar, Roland Johannes Wilhelmus
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-10T12:14:04Z
dc.date.available2023-02-10T12:14:04Z
dc.date.created2022-12-05T08:02:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLarsen, S., Haugen, M. & van den Tillaar, R. (2022). Comparison of kinematics and electromyographic activity in the last repetition during different repetition maximums in the bench press exercise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), Article 14238. doi:en_US
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050014
dc.description.abstractThe barbell bench press is often performed at different repetition maximums (RM). However, little is known about the last repetition of these repetition maximums in terms of movement kinematics and electromyographic activity in the bench press. This study compared kinematics and electromyographic activity during the last repetition of 1-RM, 3-RM, 6-RM, and 10-RM on the barbell bench press. Twelve healthy recreationally bench press-trained males (body mass: 84.3 ± 7.8 kg, age: 23.5 ± 2.6 years, height: 183.8 ± 4.2 cm) performed the bench press with a self-chosen grip width with four different repetition maximums. The participants bench pressed 96.5 ± 14.1, 88.5 ± 13.0, 81.5 ± 12.3, and 72.8 ± 10.5 kg with the 1-RM, 3-RM, 6-RM, and 10-RM. No differences were found between the bench press conditions in kinematic or electromyographic activity, except for the 10-RM, where a higher barbell velocity was observed at peak barbell deacceleration and first minimum barbell velocity (p ≤ 0.05) compared to the 1-RM and 3-RM. Overall, triceps medialis activity increased, whereas biceps brachii activity decreased from the pre-sticking to post-sticking region for all bench conditions (p ≤ 0.05). Since slower barbell velocity was observed in the sticking region for the 1-RM and 3-RM conditions compared to the 10-RM condition, we suggest training with these repetition maximums to learn how to grind through the sticking region due to the principle of specificity when the goal is to enhance maximal strength.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of kinematics and electromyographic activity in the last repetition during different repetition maximums in the bench press exerciseen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber10en_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH)en_US
dc.source.issue21en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph192114238
dc.identifier.cristin2088365
dc.source.articlenumber14238en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal